INTE 5340: L&K Chapter 2 -Facebook? Puzzles? Practice?

Phew. Made it through another acedmic chapter – I think? The word litercy drives me crazy sometimes while reading this text. In the first chapter, literacy was used over and over again in relation to the evolution of what “literacy” was. I’m not big on theory, I prefer how it affects me now and what it means today. I’m bad at history. I did pick up on the Discourse vs. discourse, so at least that point stuck in my head when beginning this chapter… good thing too since those terms were used a lot throughout this one.

Right off the bat, the author explains “literacy is always and everywhere a matter of literacies”. Literacy is not meant to be a single thing, but made of multiple aspects – just like discourses. Hey connecting the dots already!

One area that I really keyed in on was Reckwitz’s discussion about practices. The author did a good job of breaking down how one area is actually broken down into many different mental and physical processes that all accumulate into one action. I started to think about how I know to type on a keyboard (dumb example, I know) – I have to be able to understand words, sentence structure, punctuation, use motor skills to move my hands, use muscle memory to know where keys on the keyboard are, translate words in my brain to individual keystrokes, etc. It’s a rabbit whole for sure, but all of those steps/aspects equal one practice – typing this response.

The area on encoded texts… that just seemed like a lot of pages just discussing how important it is to write or record media; without writing, typing or recording voice, communication is lost. It’s like a big game of telephone – more is lost the more it is passed from person to person. There would be no game of telephone if someone just recorded their sentence and hit play.

And finally, the Facebook section. Bless Mark Zuckerberg (and his comrades) for starting a revolution. He created one platform for people from all aspects of life, countries, backgrounds, socioeconomic status, cultural norms, ways of communicating (want me to keep going?) to engage and interact together – to me, this seems like the starting point of social networking age. The intricacies of navigating Facebook and engaging in social networking has to be done the same way as there is only one way to do each of the tasts the author breaks down and lists. This all relates to the intricaies involved in practices and literacy – the many different pieces that make up the one puzzle.

At least that’s my take on it?

giphy (1).gif

2 thoughts on “INTE 5340: L&K Chapter 2 -Facebook? Puzzles? Practice?

  1. Your take on the learning to even create this post is in part where some of my take away was, too. I said it differently in that full circle all that we see and do and learn comes back to us, the individual and what we then do with what we’ve seen. We practice literacy everyday. My shift is in defining literacy…I have to think more about what I’m reading. I like the puzzle application. If we have a piece missing….then what? :-0

  2. Thank you for your critique, Dustin. I also thought the last section on Facebook was interesting and although I would consider myself a fluent Facebook user, I’ve never sat down and made a list of all the intricacies of its use. Which explains a lot about why my mother can’t seem to remember that “sharing” a photo might inadvertently give someone access to an entire photo album, or that you can customize who sees certain posts, etc. I definitely think that Facebook literacy is an indicator of a comfort and ease with technology as well as with communication.

Comments are closed.